Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal

Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal

SRA legal barristers of Chambers have represented several firms of solicitors and individual partners, and other staff members faced with investigations by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. In addition, members have extensive experience with solicitor disciplinary tribunal cases.

What is the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal?

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) is constituted as an independent, statutory tribunal under section 46 of The Solicitors Act 1974. Accordingly, it is independent of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

A solicitor (and their firm) can be referred to the SDT by the SRA or an adjudicator for alleged misconduct and a regulatory breach. It is used to adjudicate misconduct allegations carried out by solicitors, registered foreign lawyers and those employed by solicitors.

Advice has been given to major law firms, medium-size practices, and sole practitioners on a range of issues that include acting with integrity, acting in clients’ best interests, and various compliance issues including conflicts of interest, self-reporting, and financial fraud and financial services.

The SRA has undertaken a great deal of activity following a period of relative calm. The activity to be reviewed under investigation by the SRA is in respect of legal financing funds, escrow services for insurance guarantee loan schemes, and high-risk investment fraud.

Who can be Referred to the Solicitors Disciplinary?

While anybody is free to make a direct application to the SDT, most cases are made by the SRA. The SRA’s job is to gather evidence in support of the claim. The Tribunal is presented with this evidence and will reach a decision based on this information. According to the SRA, the Solicitors Disciplinary can make decisions on solicitors, registered European and foreign lawyers, authorised bodies and their managers and employees, and employees of sole practitioners.

The Solicitors Disciplinary Process

1. If you are under investigation by the SRA, the final decision to prosecute made by the Tribunal does not always amount to a finding of non-compliance. The Tribunal will review information and evidence to decide the necessary next steps.
   1. The SRA prosecute cases before the Tribunal or instruct an external solicitor to do so.
   2. Relevant parties, including the firm’s contact and the local law society, are notified about the referral.
   3. The SRA collects additional information and evidence.
   4. A statement of allegations is prepared, which is sent to the Solicitors Disciplinary
   5. If the SDT decides there is a case to answer, they will notify you and provide you with the statement and evidence.
   6. The SDT hearing takes place. We recommend attending this hearing with an expert SRA legal barrister who has knowledge of your case. The SDT will make a decision, usually immediately, after which the findings are made public.
   7. You can appeal the decision to the High Court.

Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal Cases

Jeremy Barnett’s recent cases have involved escrow accounts (£30m+), CMC regulator issues, insurance premium fraud and legal funding (axiom). Jeremy has been instructed in the following solicitors disciplinary tribunal cases:

• Re A – Escrow account for £30m Brazil Eco Housing Scheme [SRA]
• Re B – Firms who were funded by collapsed Cayman Island £100m Axiom Legal Financing Fund [SRA]
• Re C – Escrow account for Insurance guarantee loan scheme [SRA]
• Re D and E – Various CMC issues with the Claims Management Regulator [MOJ]. Data protection and PPI additional claims
• Re F – Director Disqualification [BIS]
• Re G – Advice on Fraud Compliance Regulatory Processes for major private company

Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal Decisions

In 2011, expert SRA barrister Jeremy Barnett secured a great result on a case at the SDT involving the largest ARP and run-off cover in which there had been a default on record. No payments had been made towards the total due of approximately £2m following the Administration of Sheffield firm, AMS Law.

Jeremy has also appeared in the following High Court solicitors disciplinary tribunal decisions on interventions:

• Elsdon v Law Society High Court. March 2015 Application to withdraw Intervention.
• High Court decision March 2016 in Ramasamy v Law Society.

Expert SRA Barrister

Jeremy Barnett represents several firms of solicitors and individual partners, and other staff members faced with investigations by the SRA. Trust in your solicitor is crucial, and so we urge you to work with an expert SRA legal barrister with extensive experience with solicitors disciplinary tribunal cases.

If you need legal advice regarding SRA investigations and solicitors disciplinary tribunal decisions, please get in contact.