Skip to content
St Pauls Chamber logoSt Pauls Chambers mobile logo
  • Home
  • Expertise
  • Our People
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • S
  • Find A Barrister
St Pauls Chambers mobile logo
  • Home
  • Expertise
  • Our People
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • S
  • Find A Barrister

Home / Public Law

Public Law

The public law work done by Chambers involves disputes about how people are treated by public bodies – usually, but not only, government departments and local authorities. Anybody that exercises public duties can be the subject of a claim for Judicial Review, which is how most public law claims are made.

BROWSE 

Barristers

Specialisms

Contact

PUBLIC LAW EXPERTISE

  • Commercial Disputes
  • Court of Protection
    • Health and Welfare
    • Property and Affairs
  • Education Law
    • Admissions Appeals
    • Special Educational Needs
    • Training and Legal Support
  • Police Public Law
  • Prison Law

Public Law at St Pauls Chambers

The Chambers Public Law team comprises 10 barristers of whom 3 are leading counsel(QCs). Our most experienced civil practitioner has been practising for 38 years, and our newest junior member of the team is currently 4 years into the profession.

Public Law is a little different from disputes involving contract and tort. We do not have private agreements with government or public bodies, but their decisions control large parts of our lives. They decide how many people are looked after by the same GP, and how many police officers are in our cities. They decide whether the drugs we need are available us to obtain on the NHS, and whether we qualify for free prescriptions. They decide whether we can put up our house extension, or whether our next-door neighbour is able to cut down the trees which have stood where her garden is for 400 years.

If you have a complaint about the standard of care provided by your doctor, dentist (or lawyer) this is usually an action for professional negligence. But if your complaint is that how you were treated is not just below the standard you expect, but actually offends the professional standards of integrity or basic professionalism, this then becomes a regulatory complaint. Decisions of the regulator can be questioned by way of Judicial Review, which then becomes a public law matter.

The Difference Between Public and Private Law

There are two big differences between public law and claims for tort or breach of contract (known as private law claims); these are shown by the Court asking different questions. Firstly, in a private law claim the Court will ask whether one party has kept its promises or breached them (contract), or whether the party acted reasonably or not (tort). In a public law claim however the Court will ask whether the person making the decision acted lawfully or unreasonably.

Lawfully means what it says. The council cannot charge you council tax just because it thinks it is a good idea. It can only charge you because Parliament has passed a law allowing it. The local authority cannot stop you using your home as a site for new flats because it doesn’t like the idea (or you), but because there is a policy about what is and isn’t permitted. If you want to drive a taxi you cannot be refused a private-hire license because the council doesn’t like your name. And, on an altogether bigger scale, HMRC cannot charge you a 25% penalty for not paying your tax just because you’re a day late.

Because what public authorities are allowed to do is governed by laws, it is often important to work out whether they are actually allowed to do what they have done, or are going to do, to you. Our barristers are able to answer those questions.

But, even if the public body is allowed to do what it plans to do, it still must not do so unreasonably. Whether a public body is acting reasonably can be a difficult question: there might be lots of things that could be done – many will be reasonable and some will be unreasonable. The issue is not whether the public body is right or wrong, as that is a matter of opinion. The question is whether what the public body is doing is reasonable within a range of responses that might be appropriate.

So, taking an example of your child not being given the school they wanted, or being refused the educational help that they need. Can that be the subject of a Judicial Review? Is the decision lawful? If so, is it unreasonable?

Whether something is reasonable or not depends on lots of factors. Was there a published policy? This lets people know what they can expect from the public body in question and is likely to help the body show that they were reasonable. The absence of such a policy means a decision is less likely to be reasonable. Was there an opportunity for all sides to be heard? If decisions are very contentious then it can be important to hear lots of points of view. On the other hand, the decision doesn’t have to be delayed for months while that happens – it can be reasonable to allow a limited time for people to say what they think. Is a decision always taken with the same considerations in mind? If not, people may be being treated differently, which may well be unreasonable.

The second big difference between a public law claim and a private law claim is that you can bring a private law claim as soon as what you are complaining about has happened. If you are run over you can begin legal action (beginning with a letter of claim) the next day. In a public law claim a Judicial Review happens last; you must first try and get what you want by using every other available option. For example, if there is an appeals procedure in place, you must first go through that. If there is a Tribunal to deal with the issue you must go to them first (for example when your benefits claim is refused).

Once the final decision is made then, whether unlawful or unreasonable, action has to be exceptionally quick. Most Judicial Reviews have to be brought within 3 months of the decision being complained about, and sometimes even quicker. You will often know when a decision is going to be made – in the previous example, you will have asked for the help your child needs well in advance. But sometimes you simply won’t know – for example, you may have missed the letter telling you that your medication is no longer available and the time for appealing may have gone. Whilst that might be your fault, that doesn’t mean it is a fair procedure, which in turn would make the whole decision unfair.

St Pauls Chambers Building
St Pauls Chambers houses Hannah Lynch, who has niche expertise in appeals and judicial reviews relating to educational provision for young people with disabilities. The Legal 500

Barristers

FILTER BY EXPERTISE

Please select on of the suggested variants.

QCs

  • Simon Bickler QC Head of Chambers

    Simon Bickler QC

    Call: 1998

    Silk: 2011

  • Nigel Sangster QC

    Nigel Sangster QC

    Call: 1976

    Silk: 1998

  • Richard Barraclough QC

    Richard Barraclough QC

    Call: 1980

    Silk: 2003

  • Simon Myerson QC

    Simon Myerson QC

    Call: 1986

    Silk: 2003

  • Bryan Cox

    Bryan Cox QC

    Call: 1979

    Silk: 2005

  • Jane Bewsey QC

    Jane Bewsey QC

    Call: 1986

    Silk: 2010

  • Sam Green QC

    Sam Green QC

    Call: 1998

    Silk: 2015

  • John Harrison QC

    John Harrison QC

    Call: 1994

    Silk: 2016

  • Andrew Haslam QC

    Andrew Haslam QC

    Call: 1991

    Silk: 2018

There are no QCs suiting filter condition

Members

  • Jeremy Barnett

    Jeremy Barnett

    Call: 1980

  • Philip Standfast

    Philip Standfast

    Call: 1980

  • Jonathan Sandiford

    Jonathan Sandiford

    Call: 1992

  • Nikki Saxton

    Nikki Saxton

    Call: 1992

  • Avatar Small

    Nigel Edwards

    Call: 1995

  • Robert Smith

    Robert Smith

    Call: 1995

  • Derek Duffy

    Derek Duffy

    Call: 1997

  • Cameron Brown

    Cameron Brown

    Call: 1998

  • Alasdair Campbell

    Alasdair Campbell

    Call: 1999

  • Denise Breen-Lawton

    Denise Breen-Lawton

    Call: 2000

  • Andrew Stranex

    Andrew Stranex

    Call: 2000

  • James Bourne-Arton

    James Bourne-Arton

    Call: 2001

  • Danielle Graham

    Danielle Graham

    Call: 2003

  • Hal Watson

    Hal Watson

    Call: 2003

  • James Lake

    James Lake

    Call: 2005

  • Andrew Nixon

    Andrew Nixon

    Call: 2006

  • Helen Chapman

    Helen Chapman

    Call: 2006

  • Voldi Welch

    Voldi Welch

    Call: 2008

  • Avatar Small

    Hannah Hinton

    Call: 2008

  • Angus MacDonald

    Angus MacDonald

    Call: 2009

  • Sophie Mitchell

    Sophie Mitchell

    Call: 2010

  • Hannah Lynch

    Hannah Lynch

    Call: 2011

  • Stephen Flint

    Stephen Flint

    Call: 2012

  • George Hazel-Owram

    George Hazel-Owram

    Call: 2012

  • Kristina Goodwin

    Kristina Goodwin

    Call: 2013

  • Stephen Elphick

    Stephen Elphick

    Call: 2014

  • Ayesha Smart

    Ayesha Smart

    Call: 2014

  • Charlie Greenwood

    Charlie Greenwood

    Call: 2015

  • Frances Pencheon

    Frances Pencheon

    Call: 2015

  • Jessica Heggie

    Jess Heggie

    Call: 2017

There are no Members suiting filter condition

Pupils

  • Temitayo Oguntade

    Temitayo Oguntade

    Pupil September 2018

  • Ayman Khokhar

    Ayman Khokhar

    Call: 2018

  • Harry Crowson

    Harry Crowson

    Pupil February 2019

There are no Pupils suiting filter condition

As you go into this minefield, we can help you. Our Judicial Review barristers have seen these problems before. They know what public bodies are supposed to do, and how they are supposed to behave. They are able to research any law, however obscure (and some of them really are!), and tell you whether it has been followed. They know what is reasonable and what is not, what is fair and what is not, what is justified and what is not. Furthermore, if you decide to consult us about such issues, we will give you advice independently and fairly. You will then know what your prospects are, and whether it is worth going ahead and challenging the decision or not.

Equally, if you are a public authority we can help you make the right decisions, ensuring that the public has confidence in you and that you can devote the maximum amount of your budget to providing the services you want to provide, as opposed to on defending decisions that were made without the opportunity to properly think them through. Contact our clerks for further assistance on any of the above.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Expertise

Civil Law Criminal Law Public Law Regulatory Law
Family Law Fraud Personal Injury

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Barrister Recruitment

Leeds

0113 245 5866

Address

St. Pauls Chambers
Park Row House,
19-20 Park Row,
Leeds,
LS1 5JF
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Pupillage Policy
  • Complaints
  • Disclaimer
  • Pricing Structure
  • Sitemap
© St. Paul's Chambers 2019 by That Web Look

Start typing and press enter to search

x symbol

Search

Please select on of the suggested variants.

Blog

The Latest News and Cases From The Chambers

Latest Posts

Case Studies

News

News

Success on The Legal 500 Entries for St Pauls

St Paul's Chambers January 31, 2019

St Pauls Chambers maintains its “great reputation through its proficient and hardworking individuals” Within CRIME “St Pauls Chambers has a depth of experienced counsel at all …

Case Studies

Nigel Edwards Secures A Suspended Sentence for his Client Charged with £1m Fraud

Nigel Edwards January 31, 2019

Nigel Edwards Defence Barrister for Matthew Cobley secures his client a 2 year suspended sentence. Mail Online – 31st January 2019 PPI claims bosses who …

News

Nigel Edwards to be Appointed Silk

Jayne Drake January 14, 2019

We are delighted to announce the news that Nigel Edwards is to be appointed Queen’s Counsel.  He will be sworn in at Westminster on 11th …

x symbol

Find a Barrister

FILTER BY EXPERTISE

Please select on of the suggested variants.

QCs

  • Simon Bickler QC Head of Chambers

    Simon Bickler QC

    Call: 1998

    Silk: 2011

  • Nigel Sangster QC

    Nigel Sangster QC

    Call: 1976

    Silk: 1998

  • Richard Barraclough QC

    Richard Barraclough QC

    Call: 1980

    Silk: 2003

  • Simon Myerson QC

    Simon Myerson QC

    Call: 1986

    Silk: 2003

  • Bryan Cox

    Bryan Cox QC

    Call: 1979

    Silk: 2005

  • Jane Bewsey QC

    Jane Bewsey QC

    Call: 1986

    Silk: 2010

  • Sam Green QC

    Sam Green QC

    Call: 1998

    Silk: 2015

  • John Harrison QC

    John Harrison QC

    Call: 1994

    Silk: 2016

  • Andrew Haslam QC

    Andrew Haslam QC

    Call: 1991

    Silk: 2018

There are no QCs suiting filter condition

Members

  • Jeremy Barnett

    Jeremy Barnett

    Call: 1980

  • Philip Standfast

    Philip Standfast

    Call: 1980

  • Jonathan Sandiford

    Jonathan Sandiford

    Call: 1992

  • Nikki Saxton

    Nikki Saxton

    Call: 1992

  • Avatar Small

    Nigel Edwards

    Call: 1995

  • Robert Smith

    Robert Smith

    Call: 1995

  • Derek Duffy

    Derek Duffy

    Call: 1997

  • Cameron Brown

    Cameron Brown

    Call: 1998

  • Alasdair Campbell

    Alasdair Campbell

    Call: 1999

  • Denise Breen-Lawton

    Denise Breen-Lawton

    Call: 2000

  • Andrew Stranex

    Andrew Stranex

    Call: 2000

  • James Bourne-Arton

    James Bourne-Arton

    Call: 2001

  • Danielle Graham

    Danielle Graham

    Call: 2003

  • Hal Watson

    Hal Watson

    Call: 2003

  • James Lake

    James Lake

    Call: 2005

  • Andrew Nixon

    Andrew Nixon

    Call: 2006

  • Helen Chapman

    Helen Chapman

    Call: 2006

  • Voldi Welch

    Voldi Welch

    Call: 2008

  • Avatar Small

    Hannah Hinton

    Call: 2008

  • Angus MacDonald

    Angus MacDonald

    Call: 2009

  • Sophie Mitchell

    Sophie Mitchell

    Call: 2010

  • Hannah Lynch

    Hannah Lynch

    Call: 2011

  • Stephen Flint

    Stephen Flint

    Call: 2012

  • George Hazel-Owram

    George Hazel-Owram

    Call: 2012

  • Kristina Goodwin

    Kristina Goodwin

    Call: 2013

  • Stephen Elphick

    Stephen Elphick

    Call: 2014

  • Ayesha Smart

    Ayesha Smart

    Call: 2014

  • Charlie Greenwood

    Charlie Greenwood

    Call: 2015

  • Frances Pencheon

    Frances Pencheon

    Call: 2015

  • Jessica Heggie

    Jess Heggie

    Call: 2017

There are no Members suiting filter condition

Pupils

  • Temitayo Oguntade

    Temitayo Oguntade

    Pupil September 2018

  • Ayman Khokhar

    Ayman Khokhar

    Call: 2018

  • Harry Crowson

    Harry Crowson

    Pupil February 2019

There are no Pupils suiting filter condition

x symbol

Expertise

SEARCH

Please select on of the suggested variants.

FILTER

A B C D E F G H I L M N O P R S T V
A
Actions Against The Police Admissions Appeals Adoption Law Advance Fee Fraud Asset Forfeiture Asset Recovery
B
Banking and Insurance Fraud Benefit Fraud Boiler Room Fraud Bribery Law Business Regulation
C
Care Proceedings Care Quality Commission Carousel Fraud Catastrophic Injury Chancery Law Charity Regulation - The New Fundraising Regulator Child Law Civil Law Claims Management Regulation Clinical Negligence Cohabitation Laws Commercial Disputes Commercial Law Company Directors Disqualification Competition Law Consumer Protection Law Contract Law Corporate Fraud Corporate Manslaughter Counterfeit Goods Court of Protection (Public Law) Court of Protection (Family Law) Courts Martial Credit Hire Claims Criminal Law Crowdfunding Regulation Cryptocurrency
D
Defamation Law Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Drug Crime Law
E
Education Law Entertainment Licence Environmental Law (Criminal Law) Environmental Law (Regulatory Law)
F
Family Arbitration Family Law FCA Regulation Field Sports Financial Remedy Food Hygiene Law Food Safety Law Fraud Freezing Orders Fundraising Regulator
G
General Data Protection Regulation
H
Harassment Law Health and Safety Law (Criminal Law) Health and Safety Law (Regulatory Law) Health and Welfare Healthcare Professional Discipline High Risk Investments
I
Industrial Disease Inheritance Act 1975 Inheritance, Wills and Probate Inquests Insolvency Law International Family Law
L
Licensing Law Local Authority
M
Maintenance Pending Suit Media and Communications Mediation (MIAM) Mortgage Fraud Motoring Offences
N
NHS Performers List
O
Occupational Disease
P
Personal Injury Police Discipline Police Law Police Public Law Police Regulatory Law Pre-nuptial Agreements Prison Law Private Law Children Property and Affairs Public Law
R
Regulatory Law Representing Police Forces RSPCA Prosecution
S
SFO Investigation Solicitors' Disciplinary Tribunal Special Educational Needs Sports Law (Civil Law) Sports Law (Personal Injury)
T
Tax Law Terrorism Law Toy Safety Trademark Law Trading Standards Law Trading Standards Prosecutions Traffic Commissioners Public Inquiries Training and Legal Support Tribunals Trust Law
V
VAT Fraud
x symbol

About

About Us

Our People

The Roger Scott St Pauls Trust

Policy Documents

Complaints Procedure

Facilities

Pupillage

x symbol
Scroll to Top