Home / Criminal Law / Motoring Offences
Motoring Offences
CONTACT THE CLERKS
What Are Motoring Offences?
Most motoring offences are covered by the Road Traffic Act 1988 and the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988. Motoring offences are typically classed as either dangerous driving or careless driving. Some examples include:
- Speeding
- Ignoring traffic lights or road signs
- Driving under the influence
- Driving when unfit, for example with poor vision or while overtired
- Knowingly driving an unsafe vehicle
- Distracted driving, for example driving while texting
- Driving too closely to another vehicle
- Overtaking dangerously or on the inside
There are also document offences, which include driving without an adequate driving license, insurance or an MOT.
Motoring Lawyers for Motor Fraud
For the Court to refrain from imposing a disqualification, a cogent and robust argument needs to be presented to the satisfaction of the Court. Therefore, a combination of effective advocacy and supporting evidence goes a long way in satisfying the Court that the hardship is exceptional. A motoring offence barrister can help with issues relating to motor fraud.
What Happens When a Motoring Offence is Committed?
If you are caught committing a motoring offence by a speed camera or number plate recognition camera, the police will send you a notice of intended prosecution (NIP) via post. The NIP must be filled out and returned within 28 days. Depending on the type and severity of your offence, you may be offered a speed awareness course or a conditional fixed penalty involving points on your license and a fine. Or, your case may be referred to Court, and you’ll be requested to plea guilty or not guilty.
You may be unsure of how to respond to a NIP, or think it’s incorrect. In this instance, we advise speaking to a driving offence barrister who can help you understand the claim. You can refute an accusation by requesting a Court date, but be sure to seek legal counsel from a specialist driving offence barrister before attending Court.
In the case of committing a serious motoring offence, you may be arrested and interviewed by the police. In this instance, it’s vital to appoint an experienced driving offence barrister and have them present during any interview or Court hearing. If convicted, you could face a serious fine, prison sentence or driving ban, so hiring a motoring offence barrister is crucial.
Do I Need a Driving Offence Barrister?
If you are accusing another party, or are accused yourself, of driving unlawfully, you should seek the advice of a driving offence barrister. St Pauls Chambers’ motoring offence barristers have an exemplary record of success when it comes to reaching the desired result in these cases. By appointing an experienced driving offence barrister early on, you have the best chance of success. Our comprehensive services are offered through instruction from solicitors or can be obtained directly. Please contact us for more information.
For more information about how a driving offence barrister from St Pauls Chambers can help you, please see below.

Barristers
FILTER BY EXPERTISE
Please select on of the suggested variants.
QCs
-
Head of Chambers
Simon Bickler QC
Call: 1988
Silk: 2011
-
Nigel Sangster QC
Call: 1976
Silk: 1998
-
Richard Barraclough QC
Call: 1980
Silk: 2003
-
Simon Myerson QC
Call: 1986
Silk: 2003
-
Bryan Cox QC
Call: 1979
Silk: 2005
-
Associate Tenant
Jane Bewsey QC
Call: 1986
Silk: 2010
-
Sam Green QC
Call: 1998
Silk: 2015
-
John Harrison QC
Call: 1994
Silk: 2016
-
Jonathan Sandiford QC
Call: 1992
Silk: 2020
-
Associate Tenant
Cameron Brown QC
Call: 1998
Silk: 2020
There are no QCs suiting filter condition
Members
-
Jeremy Barnett
Call: 1980
-
Philip Standfast
Call: 1980
-
Nikki Saxton
Call: 1992
-
Robert Smith
Call: 1995
-
Derek Duffy
Call: 1997
-
Nicholas Worsley
Call: 1998
-
Alasdair Campbell
Call: 1999
-
Denise Breen-Lawton
Call: 2000
-
Andrew Stranex
Call: 2000
-
Jane Brady
Call: 2001
-
James Bourne-Arton
Call: 2001
-
Sasha Bailey
Call: 2002
-
Danielle Graham
Call: 2003
-
Hal Watson
Call: 2003
-
James Lake
Call: 2005
-
Andrew Nixon
Call: 2006
-
Helen Chapman
Call: 2006
-
Voldi Welch
Call: 2008
-
Hannah Hinton
Call: 2008
-
Angus MacDonald
Call: 2009
-
Sophie Mitchell
Call: 2010
-
Hannah Lynch
Call: 2011
-
Stephen Flint
Call: 2012
-
George Hazel-Owram
Call: 2012
-
Kristina Goodwin
Call: 2013
-
Stephen Elphick
Call: 2014
-
Charlie Greenwood
Call: 2015
-
Frances Pencheon
Call: 2015
-
Jessica Heggie
Call: 2017
-
Temitayo Dasaolu
Call: 2018
-
Ayman Khokhar
Call: 2018
-
Harry Crowson
Call: 2019
-
Emma Handley
Call: 2019
There are no Members suiting filter condition
What Can a Driving Offence Barrister Help With?
Totting Up Provisions
It is becoming increasingly prevalent that motorists are at risk of losing their driving licence as a result of the totting up procedure. This occurs when a driver reaches 12 penalty points within a three-year period. Speeding, of course, being the most common.
Once an individual becomes liable for disqualification under the totting-up provisions, they could be disqualified for any period at the Court’s discretion. However, this discretion is limited by the fixing of minimum periods. If there has been no previous disqualification, then the minimum period is six months. This is standard for nearly all courts.
Avoiding a Ban Due to Exceptional Hardship
Losing your driving licence can have fairly catastrophic consequences. The disqualification is not meant to be easy, however where an individual can show the Court that any period of disqualification would cause exceptional hardship, then the Court has a discretion not to disqualify at all. The keyword being exceptional.
Losing your employment, for example as a taxi driver, is often not enough. There would usually have to be an additional feature of the case to make the hardship exceptional. It is for the individual to satisfy the Court on the balance of probability.
Importantly, it is well established that “hardship” is not confined to the hardship that will be caused to the offender; hardship can be caused to persons other than the defendant who are wholly innocent and will suffer if the offender is disqualified (Cornwall v Coke [1976] Crim LR 519).
Avoiding a Ban Due to Special Reasons
In certain circumstances, a Court has the discretion not to disqualify for an offence carrying obligatory disqualification, or to refrain from endorsing a driving licence with penalty points. These reasons are commonly referred to as special reasons.
The exercise of the discretion not to disqualify or endorse should only be exercised by the Court in clear and compelling circumstances. Each case will always be fact dependent. To amount to a special reason a matter must:
- Be a mitigating or extenuating circumstance;
- Not amount to a defence in law;
- Be directly connected with the commission of the offence;
- Be one which the Court ought properly to take into consideration when imposing a sentence.
A distinction has to be drawn between circumstances that relate to the offender and those that relate to the offence. It is this latter category that is relevant to a special reasons submission.
The following are examples of circumstances that relate to the offence which are capable of amounting to special reasons:
- Drink-driving – the fact the offender only drove for a short distance and in circumstances where he would have been unlikely to come into contact with other road users;
- Drink-driving – spiked drink;
- Speeding – emergency;
- Insurance/Speeding – offender genuinely believed had insurance or misled by others.
If you would like to discuss the possibility of instructing a driving offence barrister, please contact the clerking team on 0844 2722322.