CONTACT THE CLERKS
Bribery & Corruption Barristers
Bribery law barristers at St Pauls Chambers are well versed in bribery legislation and anti-bribery policy. They have experience with:
- bribery and corruption cases;
- advising internal corporate investigations;
- the self-report process;
- assistance with the serious fraud investigation;
- negotiation and conclusion of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA);
- and the monitoring of compliance with the terms of a DPA.
St Pauls Chambers corruption barristers are highly experienced in complex bribery cases and have represented in notable cases. In July 2019, John Harrison QC made legal history by securing the first-ever bribery acquittal for a client following a Deferred Prosecution Agreement. Read more about this unprecedented achievement here.
Those considering the first step in the process of a self-report should consider the Serious Fraud Office’s (SFO) Guidance on Corporate Self Reporting. Any such action should be prompt and part of a proactive corporate management approach when offending is first discovered.
Guidance on whether a DPA will be considered to be appropriate requires the consideration of three Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) documents:
- The Code for Crown Prosecutors
- The Joint Prosecution Guidance on Corporate Prosecutions
- The Bribery Guidance
The SFO & CPS have produced the DPA Code of Practice which provides a framework for those negotiating, applying for and monitoring a DPA.
St Pauls Chambers have been fortunate enough to have received instructions in this new area of bribery law and corruption and, as far as we are aware, are the only set outside of London to have done so.

Barristers
FILTER BY EXPERTISE
Please select on of the suggested variants.
QCs
-
Head of Chambers
Simon Bickler QC
Call: 1988
Silk: 2011
-
Nigel Sangster QC
Call: 1976
Silk: 1998
-
Richard Barraclough QC
Call: 1980
Silk: 2003
-
Simon Myerson QC
Call: 1986
Silk: 2003
-
Bryan Cox QC
Call: 1979
Silk: 2005
-
Associate Tenant
Jane Bewsey QC
Call: 1986
Silk: 2010
-
Sam Green QC
Call: 1998
Silk: 2015
-
John Harrison QC
Call: 1994
Silk: 2016
-
Jonathan Sandiford QC
Call: 1992
Silk: 2020
-
Associate Tenant
Cameron Brown QC
Call: 1998
Silk: 2020
There are no QCs suiting filter condition
Members
-
Jeremy Barnett
Call: 1980
-
Philip Standfast
Call: 1980
-
Nikki Saxton
Call: 1992
-
Robert Smith
Call: 1995
-
Derek Duffy
Call: 1997
-
Nicholas Worsley
Call: 1998
-
Alasdair Campbell
Call: 1999
-
Denise Breen-Lawton
Call: 2000
-
Andrew Stranex
Call: 2000
-
Jane Brady
Call: 2001
-
James Bourne-Arton
Call: 2001
-
Sasha Bailey
Call: 2002
-
Danielle Graham
Call: 2003
-
Hal Watson
Call: 2003
-
James Lake
Call: 2005
-
Andrew Nixon
Call: 2006
-
Helen Chapman
Call: 2006
-
Voldi Welch
Call: 2008
-
Hannah Hinton
Call: 2008
-
Angus MacDonald
Call: 2009
-
Sophie Mitchell
Call: 2010
-
Hannah Lynch
Call: 2011
-
Stephen Flint
Call: 2012
-
George Hazel-Owram
Call: 2012
-
Kristina Goodwin
Call: 2013
-
Stephen Elphick
Call: 2014
-
Charlie Greenwood
Call: 2015
-
Frances Pencheon
Call: 2015
-
Jessica Heggie
Call: 2017
-
Temitayo Dasaolu
Call: 2018
-
Ayman Khokhar
Call: 2018
-
Harry Crowson
Call: 2019
-
Emma Handley
Call: 2019
There are no Members suiting filter condition
What is Bribery Law?
Bribery law is covered by the Bribery Act 2010 is a complete reworking of the old bribery legislation, both from statute and common law, by setting out four offences that can be committed by both individuals and corporate defendants. It came into force on 1st July 2011.
The purpose of the Bribery Act is to encourage companies to ensure and demonstrate that they have adequate procedures in place to prevent any bribery. As well as this, the Act has penalties in place for individuals or companies that partake in bribery.
Acts of bribery are defined under four main offences:
- Two general offences are defined within the Act, known as active bribery (the offering, promising, and giving of a bribe), and passive bribery (the requesting, agreeing to receive, or accepting of a bribe)
- A discrete offence of the bribery of a foreign public official
- A new offence of failure by a commercial organisation to prevent a bribe from being paid to obtain or retain business or a business advantage
How Does Bribery Law Work?
Guidance on how Bribery Act offences should be approached by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) are set out within their document, The Bribery Act 2010: Joint Prosecution Guidance (The Bribery Act Guidance).
There are some cases where a bribery offence occurs as a single isolated incident, on behalf of an organisation. Section 7 of the Bribery Act works to demonstrate that an organisation has adequate bribery prevention procedures in place, recognising that bribery cannot be prevented at all times, even if there is a prevention scheme in place. This defence acts as a motivation for organisations to ensure that relevant procedures are in place.
The Act describes six principles that should inform an organisation wishing to prevent bribery being committed on their behalf:
- Proportionate procedures
- Top-level commitment
- Risk assessment
- Due diligence
- Communication (includes training)
- Monitoring and review
Bribery Prevention Procedures
Bribery prevention procedures are particularly important in cases where an organisation has self-referred a bribery incident to prosecution authorities. When the official criminal proceedings take place for the incident, the organisation’s co-operation will be taken into account.
An important adjunct to the Bribery Act is the emergence of Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPA), Schedule 17 CCA 2013. This relatively new area of law, within England and Wales, has changed the focus of case settlement from civil to criminal sanction and the deferment of any prosecution. This is an exciting and interesting area of law for practitioners and is also of enormous significance for corporates.
Being found in breach of the Bribery Act 2010 could result in criminal prosecution, an unlimited fine and up to 10 years imprisonment, applicable to the directors of a company, as well as the company itself. Seeking expert legal advice from experienced corruption barristers is vital.
Compliance with The Bribery Act
Compliance with the Act, even in international areas of dubious commercial integrity, will be possible if the entity involved has acted proportionally in endeavouring to do so. However, the extent or reach of the Act must be born in mind.
An employee, or agent, contractor, supplier and joint-venture partner, of the organisation involved, can act to incur criminal liability on the organisation itself and the widespread use of small ‘facilitation payments’ in many jurisdictions may also expose the organisation to criminal liability under the Act. However, prosecutorial discretion is expected to allow for such small payments in parts of the world where they are culturally ingrained, subject to the attitude of the commercial organisation concerned to the implementation of other suggested measures required by the Act.
Bribery Legislation Advice
If you need advice regarding bribery legislation or corruption cases, please contact our team of corruption barristers.