Skip to content
St Pauls Chamber logoSt Pauls Chambers mobile logo
  • Home
  • Expertise
  • Our People
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • S
  • Find A Barrister
St Pauls Chambers mobile logo
  • Home
  • Expertise
  • Our People
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • S
  • Find A Barrister

Home / Fraud / Asset Forfeiture

Asset Forfeiture

Barristers at St Pauls Chambers provide legal advice and strategy guidance on all aspects of financial crime, including asset forfeiture.

BROWSE 

Barristers

Specialisms

Contact

CONTACT THE CLERKS

  • Clerk Jayne Drake

    Jayne Drake

    0113 2270703 Email
  • Clerk Matthew Taylor

    Matthew Taylor

    0113 2270706 Email
  • Clerk Kelly Staniforth

    Kelly Staniforth

    0113 2270705 Email

What is Asset Forfeiture?

All asset forfeiture procedures are initiated under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), which fall into three types:

  • Confiscation proceedings
  • Cash forfeiture proceedings
  • Civil recovery proceedings currently brought by the Assets Recovery Agency (ARA)

Neither cash proceedings nor proceedings for a civil recovery order require a prior criminal conviction. Experienced barristers at St Pauls can provide legal advice at every step of the way during any forfeiture proceedings.

Confiscation is a very important area of law. It has far-reaching consequences for defendants. The rules on confiscation appear quite complex but taken a stage at a time they can be easily understood. Defendants will want to ensure that the benefit figure is as low as possible to reduce the amount of money payable under a confiscation order – this will be of particular importance for defendants with a significant amount of assets.

Confiscation proceedings for criminal forfeiture follow the vast majority of crimes involving fraud, tax evasion, and money laundering. The proceedings can follow the course of confiscation, cash seizure, restraint, receivership, or freezing orders. They are in place to deprive the defendant, as well as friends, family, or colleagues, of any possible financial benefit from criminal conduct.

Civil recovery proceedings are different from criminal forfeiture and are taken in the High Court. It needs to be established that on the balance of probabilities, criminal forfeiture activity has taken place and the funds which it seeks to recover, represent the proceeds of crime. Unlike confiscation proceedings, civil recovery concentrates on the property in actual ownership of the defendant.

For more information on forfeiture proceedings, as well as criminal forfeiture, please refer to our blog post.

 

St Pauls Chambers Building
St Pauls provides expert legal advice with every step of the way for asset forfeiture procedures. Contact us if you require assistance from a forfeiture lawyer in this domain.

Barristers

FILTER BY EXPERTISE

Please select on of the suggested variants.

KCs

  • Sam Green QC Joint Head of Chambers

    Sam Green KC

    Call: 1998

    Silk: 2015

  • Nigel Sangster QC Associate Tenant

    Nigel Sangster KC

    Call: 1976

    Silk: 1998

  • Richard Barraclough QC

    Richard Barraclough KC

    Call: 1980

    Silk: 2003

  • Simon Myerson QC

    Simon Myerson KC

    Call: 1986

    Silk: 2003

  • Bryan Cox

    Bryan Cox KC

    Call: 1979

    Silk: 2005

  • Jane Bewsey QC Associate Tenant

    Jane Bewsey KC

    Call: 1986

    Silk: 2010

  • Simon Bickler QC

    Simon Bickler KC

    Call: 1988

    Silk: 2011

  • John Harrison QC Associate Tenant

    John Harrison KC

    Call: 1994

    Silk: 2016

  • Jonathan Sandiford

    Jonathan Sandiford KC

    Call: 1992

    Silk: 2020

  • Cameron Brown Associate Tenant

    Cameron Brown KC

    Call: 1998

    Silk: 2020

There are no KCs suiting filter condition

Members

  • Denise Breen-Lawton Joint Head of Chambers

    Denise Breen-Lawton

    Call: 2000

  • Jeremy Barnett- Barrister

    Jeremy Barnett

    Call: 1980

  • Philip Standfast

    Philip Standfast

    Call: 1980

  • Nikki Saxton

    Nikki Saxton

    Call: 1992

  • Robert Smith

    Robert Smith

    Call: 1995

  • Associate Tenant

    David Hughes

    Call: 1997

  • Derek Duffy

    Derek Duffy

    Call: 1997

  • Nick Worsley Barrister

    Nicholas Worsley

    Call: 1998

  • Alasdair Campbell

    Alasdair Campbell

    Call: 1999

  • Andrew Stranex

    Andrew Stranex

    Call: 2000

  • Jane Brady | Barrister Leeds

    Jane Brady

    Call: 2001

  • James Bourne-Arton

    James Bourne-Arton

    Call: 2001

  • Danielle Graham

    Danielle Graham

    Call: 2003

  • Hal Watson

    Hal Watson

    Call: 2003

  • James Lake

    James Lake

    Call: 2005

  • Andrew Nixon

    Andrew Nixon

    Call: 2006

  • Helen Chapman

    Helen Chapman

    Call: 2006

  • Voldi Welch - Barrister at Law

    Voldi Welch

    Call: 2008

  • Associate Tenant

    Hannah Hinton

    Call: 2008

  • Angus MacDonald

    Angus MacDonald

    Call: 2009

  • Sophie Mitchell

    Sophie Mitchell

    Call: 2010

  • Hannah Lynch

    Hannah Lynch

    Call: 2011

  • Stephen Flint

    Stephen Flint

    Call: 2012

  • George Hazel-Owram

    George Hazel-Owram

    Call: 2012

  • Kristina Goodwin

    Kristina Goodwin

    Call: 2013

  • Stephen Elphick

    Stephen Elphick

    Call: 2014

  • Charlie Greenwood

    Charlie Greenwood

    Call: 2015

  • Frances Pencheon

    Frances Pencheon

    Call: 2015

  • Jessica Heggie

    Jessica Heggie

    Call: 2017

  • Harry Crowson

    Harry Crowson

    Call: 2018

  • Temitayo Oguntade

    Temitayo Dasaolu

    Call: 2018

  • Ayman Khokhar

    Ayman Khokhar

    Call: 2018

  • Emma Handley

    Emma Handley

    Call: 2019

  • Matthew Moore-Taylor

    Call: 2020

There are no Members suiting filter condition

Pupils

  • Eleanor Guildford

    Pupil November 2021

There are no Pupils suiting filter condition

Proceeds of Crime Act

The POCA is principally designed to target “career criminals” and hit them in their pockets. To that end, when defendants are convicted of a criminal forfeiture offence either by pleading guilty or being convicted after a trial, they may be subject to a POCA application.

Any application falls into 2 parts:

  • What has the defendant benefited from either for the offence or in the past from crime? (BENEFIT)
  • What can he afford to pay? (AVAILABLE AMOUNT)

The first step is always the benefit figure.

Certain offences listed in Schedule 2 (normally drugs offences and the like) of POCA will mean the defendant has a ‘criminal lifestyle’. If not, the court will ask whether he has benefited from that offence. The main question at the outset is therefore whether the prosecution is saying that the defendant has benefited from just that offence or has a criminal lifestyle. If the court finds the defendant to have a criminal lifestyle, the effects are significant.

The court will then look back up to 6 years and assumes all unaccounted monies, exchanges of property, payments that have been from crime. For example, someone may have gifted him/her £10,000 5 years before the current offence this will be considered criminal unless the defendant can prove it didn’t come from criminality.

The defence has to look back through 6 years’ worth of receipts, claims, and property transactions. Also proving to the court that they are legitimate.

How St Pauls Can Help with Asset Forfeiture Laws

This is where St Pauls Chambers can assist.  Forfeiture lawyers at St Pauls are highly experienced in the provisions of the Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) and ready to defend and advise you through the complexities of either proceedings or appeals. Contact St Pauls and we will put you in touch with a solicitor, an accountant and a barrister.

Court Process During Asset Forfeiture Proceedings

The first step is for the prosecution to inform the defence that POCA proceedings will follow. This is usually on the day of sentence for the main offence. A timetable will always be set which will follow the following rough guide:

  • Section 18 statement (defence) – an affidavit from the defendant stating the total assets he holds;
  • Section 16 response (prosecution) – the prosecution provide a report from a financial investigator stating what the benefit figure and available amount is;
  • Section 17 (defence) – response from the defence arguing, usually, that either or both the benefit figures and available amount is too high.
  • A directions hearing and then a final hearing if the case does not settle before then.

There are three important considerations to make during this. Firstly, is the case particular criminal conduct (that offence only), or general criminal conduct (lifestyle). Secondly, what is the available amount? And thirdly, negotiation of the lowest possible figure.

If you would like St Pauls Chambers to assist on such a matter, please get in touch.  We will put you in touch will all the best solicitors and accountants and of course, we can provide you with one of our barristers in this field.

Restraining Orders

During asset forfeiture proceedings, the Drug Trafficking Act (DTA) and the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) can give the High Court jurisdiction to make a temporary restraining order (RO) of assets that are pending in the criminal proceedings. This includes property coming into his possession after the making of the order.

These are often required to be obtained at very short notice, and Barristers at St Pauls have extensive experience of dealing with these matters quickly.

The only limitation to the scope of a RO is that the Prosecutor must not seek a RO over assets greater in value than the amount by which the Defendant is alleged to have benefited from his crimes. Restraint under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) applies to all criminal offences committed after 24th March 2003.

There is no distinction between drug trafficking and other criminal offences. Offences alleged to have been committed before that date will be dealt with under the DTA or CJA regime as applicable.

If you would like to instruct one of our forfeiture barristers on any matter concerning asset forfeiture laws or recovery, please contact the clerks.

Blog

The Latest Asset Forfeiture News and Cases

Follow our blog for further information on the latest Asset Forfeiture news and cases.

  • Civil Law

2y ago

Understanding Civil Forfeiture Laws

Civil asset forfeiture is defined as when personal assets are seized by law enforcement if there is reason to believe …

Understanding Civil Forfeiture Laws Read More »

by St Paul's Chambers

Expertise

Civil Law Criminal Law Public Law Regulatory Law
Family Law Fraud Personal Injury

Quick Links

  • Home
  • About
  • Barrister Recruitment

Leeds

0113 245 5866

Address

St. Pauls Chambers
Park Row House,
19-20 Park Row,
Leeds,
LS1 5JF
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy
  • Pupillage Policy
  • Complaints
  • Disclaimer
  • Pricing Structure
  • Sitemap
© St. Paul's Chambers 2023 by That Web Look
x symbol

Search

Please select on of the suggested variants.

Blog

The Latest News and Cases From The Chambers

Latest Posts

Case Studies

News

Criminal Law

Eleanor Williams is Sentenced for False Rape and Grooming Claims

St Paul's Chambers March 14, 2023

Jonathan Sandiford KC leading Barbara Webster for the Crown on the trial and sentence of Eleanor Williams.   Williams has been sentenced to eight and …

Fraud

What Are the Penalties for Benefit Fraud?

St Paul's Chambers March 2, 2023

With around 600 people convicted of benefit fraud offences between 2021 and 2022, it is important to be aware of the potential penalties of benefit …

Regulatory Law

What to Expect in a Dawn Raid

St Paul's Chambers February 14, 2023

If your business is suspected of behaving unlawfully, whether that involves breaching business regulations, competition law or corporate fraud law, it may be subject to …

x symbol

Find a Barrister

FILTER BY EXPERTISE

Please select on of the suggested variants.

KCs

  • Sam Green QC Joint Head of Chambers

    Sam Green KC

    Call: 1998

    Silk: 2015

  • Nigel Sangster QC Associate Tenant

    Nigel Sangster KC

    Call: 1976

    Silk: 1998

  • Richard Barraclough QC

    Richard Barraclough KC

    Call: 1980

    Silk: 2003

  • Simon Myerson QC

    Simon Myerson KC

    Call: 1986

    Silk: 2003

  • Bryan Cox

    Bryan Cox KC

    Call: 1979

    Silk: 2005

  • Jane Bewsey QC Associate Tenant

    Jane Bewsey KC

    Call: 1986

    Silk: 2010

  • Simon Bickler QC

    Simon Bickler KC

    Call: 1988

    Silk: 2011

  • John Harrison QC Associate Tenant

    John Harrison KC

    Call: 1994

    Silk: 2016

  • Jonathan Sandiford

    Jonathan Sandiford KC

    Call: 1992

    Silk: 2020

  • Cameron Brown Associate Tenant

    Cameron Brown KC

    Call: 1998

    Silk: 2020

There are no KCs suiting filter condition

Members

  • Denise Breen-Lawton Joint Head of Chambers

    Denise Breen-Lawton

    Call: 2000

  • Jeremy Barnett- Barrister

    Jeremy Barnett

    Call: 1980

  • Philip Standfast

    Philip Standfast

    Call: 1980

  • Nikki Saxton

    Nikki Saxton

    Call: 1992

  • Robert Smith

    Robert Smith

    Call: 1995

  • Associate Tenant

    David Hughes

    Call: 1997

  • Derek Duffy

    Derek Duffy

    Call: 1997

  • Nick Worsley Barrister

    Nicholas Worsley

    Call: 1998

  • Alasdair Campbell

    Alasdair Campbell

    Call: 1999

  • Andrew Stranex

    Andrew Stranex

    Call: 2000

  • Jane Brady | Barrister Leeds

    Jane Brady

    Call: 2001

  • James Bourne-Arton

    James Bourne-Arton

    Call: 2001

  • Danielle Graham

    Danielle Graham

    Call: 2003

  • Hal Watson

    Hal Watson

    Call: 2003

  • James Lake

    James Lake

    Call: 2005

  • Andrew Nixon

    Andrew Nixon

    Call: 2006

  • Helen Chapman

    Helen Chapman

    Call: 2006

  • Voldi Welch - Barrister at Law

    Voldi Welch

    Call: 2008

  • Associate Tenant

    Hannah Hinton

    Call: 2008

  • Angus MacDonald

    Angus MacDonald

    Call: 2009

  • Sophie Mitchell

    Sophie Mitchell

    Call: 2010

  • Hannah Lynch

    Hannah Lynch

    Call: 2011

  • Stephen Flint

    Stephen Flint

    Call: 2012

  • George Hazel-Owram

    George Hazel-Owram

    Call: 2012

  • Kristina Goodwin

    Kristina Goodwin

    Call: 2013

  • Stephen Elphick

    Stephen Elphick

    Call: 2014

  • Charlie Greenwood

    Charlie Greenwood

    Call: 2015

  • Frances Pencheon

    Frances Pencheon

    Call: 2015

  • Jessica Heggie

    Jessica Heggie

    Call: 2017

  • Harry Crowson

    Harry Crowson

    Call: 2018

  • Temitayo Oguntade

    Temitayo Dasaolu

    Call: 2018

  • Ayman Khokhar

    Ayman Khokhar

    Call: 2018

  • Emma Handley

    Emma Handley

    Call: 2019

  • Matthew Moore-Taylor

    Call: 2020

There are no Members suiting filter condition

Pupils

  • Eleanor Guildford

    Pupil November 2021

There are no Pupils suiting filter condition

x symbol

Expertise

SEARCH

Please select on of the suggested variants.

FILTER

A B C D E F G H I L M N O P R S T V
A
Actions Against The Police Admissions Appeals Adoption Law Advance Fee Fraud Asset Forfeiture Asset Recovery
B
Banking and Insurance Fraud Benefit Fraud Boiler Room Fraud Bribery Law Business Regulation
C
Care Proceedings Care Quality Commission Carousel Fraud Catastrophic Injury Chancery Law Charity Fraud Charity Regulation - The New Fundraising Regulator Child Law Civil Law Claims Management Regulation Clinical Negligence Cohabitation Laws Commercial Disputes Commercial Law Company Directors Disqualification Competition Law Consumer Protection Law Contract Law Copyright Fraud Corporate Fraud Corporate Manslaughter Counterfeit Goods Court Martial Court of Protection (Public Law) Court of Protection (Family Law) Credit Hire Claims Criminal Law Crowdfunding Regulation Cryptocurrency
D
Defamation Law Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards Drug Crime Law
E
Education Law Entertainment Licence Environmental Law
F
Family Arbitration Family Law FCA Regulation Field Sports Financial Remedy Food Fraud Food Safety Law Fraud Freezing Orders Fundraising Regulator
G
General Data Protection Regulation
H
Harassment Law Health and Safety Law (Regulatory Law) Health and Safety Law (Criminal Law) Health and Welfare Healthcare Professional Discipline High Risk Investments
I
Industrial Disease Inheritance Act 1975 Inheritance, Wills and Probate Inquests Insolvency Law International Family Law Investment Fraud
L
Licensing Law Local Authority
M
Maintenance Pending Suit Media and Communications Mediation (MIAM) Money Laundering Mortgage Fraud Motoring Fraud Motoring Offences
N
NHS Performers List
O
Occupational Disease
P
Personal Injury Police Discipline and Police Regulations Police Law Pre-nuptial Agreements Prison Law Private Law Children Property and Affairs Public Law
R
Regulatory Law RSPCA Prosecution
S
SFO Investigation Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal Special Education Law Sports Law Sports Law - Personal Injury
T
Tax Law Terrorism Law Toy Safety Trademark Law Trading Standards Trading Standards Law Trading Standards Prosecutions Traffic Commissioners Public Inquiries Training and Legal Support Tribunals Trust Law
V
VAT Fraud
x symbol

About

  • About Us
  • Our People
  • The Roger Scott St Pauls Trust
  • Wellbeing at the Bar
  • Policy Documents
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Facilities
  • Pupillage
x symbol
Scroll to Top