Sam Green KC was called to the Bar of England and Wales in 1998 and to the Bar of Northern Ireland in 2007. Sam has a varied practice covering heavyweight litigation in the criminal, regulatory and civil jurisdictions.

Sam is briefed in the most serious fraud, organised crime and terrorism cases. He has experience of conducting the most serious and complex Police Misconduct Proceedings, both presenting and defending. He recently acted on behalf of the Police Federation of England and Wales in the Hillsborough Inquests. He regularly acts for claimants, defendants and interested parties in Judicial Review claims, often in cases determining the proper interpretation of provisions from the host of regulations governing the police service.

Sam was elected Joint Head of Chambers in September 2022, alongside Denise Breen-Lawton.

He has significant experience in healthcare regulatory work, having appeared on behalf of healthcare professionals facing disciplinary proceedings brought by the HPC, GMC and NMC.

Sam has a keen interest in matters of business crime and regulation. Matters brought by the Financial Conduct Authority are of particular interest.

The 2022 Edition of the The Legal 500, Business & Regulatory Crime describes Sam as:

“An extremely personable individual who is always on top of his brief, impressive with clients and an excellent court room performer who commands the respect of the court.”

Before taking silk, Sam was on “List A” of the List of Specialist Regulatory Health & Safety and Environmental Law Advocates and conducted civil litigation for government departments as Junior Counsel to the Crown (Regional Panel). In 2015, he was one of only three Queen’s Counsel on the list of new silks whose broad fields of practice were listed as both civil and criminal law, reflecting his unusual ability to straddle both jurisdictions successfully.

Expertise

Sam is an experienced trial advocate, having been called to the Bar of England and Wales in 1998 and to the Bar of Northern Ireland in 2007. He has acted for the prosecution and defence on an impressive selection of criminal cases including murder and manslaughter, fraud and business crime, importation, people trafficking and gangland execution.

Notable Complex Crime cases


R v TK

Prosecuted (leading Jeremy Evans) defendant charged with murdering his brother by stabbing. Convicted.


R v A & A

Prosecuted two brothers charged with attacking two other brothers, murdering one and causing the other GBH with intent. Both convicted on both counts.


R v JM & Others

Conspiracy to murder. Defending. Prosecution alleged failed hit in context of organised crime.


R v CS & AM

Defending first defendant in cut-throat murder.


R v RK & Others

Defending the first defendant of seven in cut-throat torture murder.


R v TU & KS

Defended charge of murder alleged to arise from organised crime double-cross. Acquitted of murder. Convicted of manslaughter.


R v FS & AS

Defending alleged conspiracy to engage in preparation of acts of terrorism.


R v PJ & PL

Defended police officer accused of aiding and abetting s.18 of suspect by dog bite. Both officers acquitted after five-week trial.


R v JW (2018)

Secured acquittal of defendant accused of conspiracy to murder. Girlfriend of alleged gangland rival shot in face at point blank range.


R v MP (2018)

Defending alleged murder of another family member by stabbing following a relative’s funeral. Acquitted of murder and convicted of manslaughter.


R v DA (2018)

Defending man charge with murder. Defendant had, several years previously, been convicted of causing deceased grievous bodily harm with intent. Prosecution case was that the deceased subsequently succumbed to the injuries he had sustained during the assault which led to the earlier conviction, and therefore charged Defendant with murder. Issues included the way in which the original conviction could be used in the murder trial and complicated issues of medical causation.


R v MP (2018)

Defending man accused of beating his mother’s abusive lover to death.


R v HK

Defence (with Angus MacDonald) of young man accused of attempted murder of a criminal dealing drugs near a cemetery at night and armed robbery. Prosecution case was that the shooting was a failed hit. Acquitted of attempted murder, and convicted of causing grievous bodily harm with intent instead.


R v KC

Successful defence (with Andrew Haslam) of a man accused of murdering an older male who had abused the accused sexually when the accused was a child. Following cross-examination of principal prosecution witnesses, Crown accepted defendant’s plea of manslaughter on basis of loss of control and diminished responsibility.


R v M & E [2017] EWCA Crim. 739

Appeared at sentence appeal on behalf of one of two fifteen-year-olds believed to be Britain’s youngest double murderers, resulting in 20-year minimum terms being reduced to 17.5 years. Issues argued also included appropriateness of continued reporting restrictions.


R v NS

Prosecuted man following frenzied axe attack on police officer whilst on duty, resulting in injuries of the utmost gravity. Sentenced to 15 years.


R v CF

Defendant charged with murder. Fatal stabbing on a street in Newcastle following a house party involving drink, drugs and sex.


R v DM

Defendant charged with manslaughter. Scrutiny of complex pathology evidence rendered homicide charge unsustainable, so Crown accepted plea to inflicting grievous bodily harm.


LR v CB

Led Keith Thomas of LT Law, Carlisle. Defending. Secured the acquittal of a man charged with the manslaughter of his four-week old baby. During the 2 1⁄2 week trial, the Prosecution relied upon a fracture to the child’s skull, along with what the experts termed a “modified triad” of internal head injuries – subdural bleeding, a swollen brain, and bleeding within the sheath of the optic nerves – as being diagnostic of non-accidental traumatic causation, and alleged that only the father had the opportunity to assault his child in the period immediately before death. Defence case was that the fracture might have happened after death, in which case the modified triad not conclusive proof of non-accidentally caused trauma and, in any event, if non-accidental, there was another potential culprit.


R v Johnson

Led Stephen Welford. Represented one of three defendants, charged with conspiracy to murder (shooting in Leeds). Client alleged to have provided the gun used by the shooter. Pleaded guilty, on second day of trial, to possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life.


R v Johnson & Ollerhead

M62 hen-party crash. Allegations of causing death by dangerous driving. Defending the minibus driver.

Notable Police Discipline & Police Regulations cases


Chief Constable of Greater Manchester v PJ and PL

Defending one of two police officers accused of using a police German Shepherd dog as a weapon on suspects trying to flee lawful apprehension and resist arrest. Both officers exonerated.


Chief Constable of Humberside Police v SW

Defending police officer against misconduct allegations advanced on direction of the IPCC against one of the officers accused of conducting unauthorised surveillance during inquests into death of former paratrooper. (Effectively alleged spying on sister of deceased and her legal representative.) Case dismissed at end of Chief Constable’s case.


Chief Constable of South Yorkshire v ML

Police officer facing multiple misconduct allegations including using police helicopter to view a couple having sex in their garden on one occasion and another couple sunbathing nude on another. Single finding of misconduct, namely that he on one occasion only failed to prevent a rogue colleague into the swinging scene from videoing the open-air intercourse. Panel exonerated him of the principal allegations


DC Simon Jones v Merseyside Police

Represented appellant in successful appeal to Police Appeals Tribunal, against findings of gross misconduct and consequent dismissal, on basis of unreasonableness of first instance findings.


DC Chatha v Humberside Police

Represented appellant in successful appeal to Police Appeals Tribunal against outcome/sanction. Appellant reinstated


PCs Green & Stewart v Derbyshire Police

Represented appellant in successful appeal to Police Appeals Tribunal, against findings of gross misconduct and consequent dismissal, on basis of inadequacy of pleading of the charge.


Maxwell

First case of gross misconduct against serving Chief Constable in over 30 years

Extensive knowledge of coronial law and the body of law expounding the effect of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights on the inquest process.

Two recent inquests in Northern Ireland arising from death of elderly patients as a result of post-operative complications following surgery to remove gallbladder. Represented consultant surgeon who conducted both procedures. Both cases involved a significant body of expert evidence.

Instructed (with Paul Greaney QC and Chloe Fairley) for the Police Federation of England and Wales in the inquests arising from the Hillsborough football stadium disaster.

Represented two GPs in first ever inquest into a stillbirth in Northern Ireland.

Inquiry into Hyponatraemia-related deaths in Northern Ireland. Public inquiry chaired by Mr Justice O’Hara. Acted for various consultants who are Interested Parties.

Represented GP in inquest whose management of a deceased prisoner’s epilepsy drug regime the next-of-kin sought to impugn.

Represented (with John Beggs QC) retired GP in inquest into deaths of three of his terminally ill patients. Key issues were the amounts of morphine administered to his patients in their final hours, the justification for the dosages selected and whether those dosages accelerated or hastened their deaths.

Notable Regulatory Law Barristers cases


Inquest into the death of Yasser Yaqub

represented V39, the firearms officer who shot the deceased dead on a slip road off the M62. Jury returned a conclusion that Yasser Yaqub was lawfully killed.


R v David Lloyd Leisure

Prosecuting leisure club company for breach of statutory duty resulting in the death by drowning of a young boy in the indoor pool at its Leeds club.


R v ST Ltd (2019)

Defence of FTSE 250 company accused of breaching s.2 Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. Employee sustained serious hand injuries. Company pleaded on basis accepted by Prosecution and Court.


R v B Ltd (2019)

Prosecution of company for breach of s.3 Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. Sliding gate installed by company ran off its rails and then fell onto a child, killing him.


Nursing and Midwifery Council v Marsh

Defending Registered Mental Nurse against allegations of abuse and neglect of vulnerable care home residents. No impairment found and registrant explicitly exonerated by Panel.

Sam has represented a number of police and prison service representatives in civil claims for damages on matters including misfeasance in public office, unlawful arrest and malicious prosecution.

Notable Civil Law cases


Acted for Police and Crime Commissioner against a former Chief Constable alleged to have been unjustly enriched.


Acted for a Police and Crime Commissioner against an ex-Chief Constable alleged to have been unjustly enriched.


Acted for Crown Prosecution Service defending claim alleging malicious prosecution and misfeasance in public office.


Acted for a chief constable defending claim by a police officer from another force alleging unlawful arrest and false imprisonment.


Acted for a chief constable defending claim by a young man with autism alleging unlawful arrest and false imprisonment.


Crawford v Ministry of Justice (2013)

Acting for Defendant in claim for damages by prisoner who claimed to have been assaulted by prison officers.


Wright v Ministry of Justice (2011)

Acting for Defendant in claim for damages for prisoner who claimed to have been assaulted by prison officers.


Khan v Western Health and Social Services Trust [2010] NIQB 92

Acted for Northern Irish Surgeon claiming damages from the Trust employing him for breach of contract.

Sam is regularly instructed on behalf of claimants, defendants and interested parties in Judicial Review claims, often in cases determining the proper interpretation of provisions from the host of regulations governing the police service.

Notable Judicial Review cases


R (B50) v HM Assistant Coroner for the East Riding of Yorkshire and Hull [2023] EWHC 81 (Admin)

represented claimant police firearms officer in judicial review of Defendant’s decision to leave unlawful killing conclusion to the inquest jury. Issues included proper application of the Galbraith PLUS test and the adequacy of the Defendant’s summing up to the jury


R (Fisher) v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [2017] EWHC 455 (Admin)

Judicial review about police injury pensions before Mr Justice Garnham.


R (Woods & Gorton) v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police [2014] EWHC 2784 Admin

Acted for claimant police officers challenging their continued subjection to a Service Confidence Procedure.


R (Chief Constable of Derbyshire Police) v The Police Appeals Tribunal [2012] EWHC 2280 (Admin)

Successfully resisted claimant’s attempt to overturn a decision of the PAT reinstating two police officers previously sacked for gross misconduct. Substantial points of principle raised, with nationwide importance, in relation to police misconduct procedures. Key issues included meaning of “unreasonable” in Rule 4(4)(a) of the Police Appeals Tribunals Rules 2008 and whether the charges alleging gross misconduct must identify each of the Standards of Professional Behaviour alleged to have been breached.


R (Haworth) v Northumbria Police Authority [2012] EWHC 1225 (Admin)

Challenge to Police Authority’s refusal to exercise statutory discretion to allow reopening of previously determined review of injury pension entitlement.


R (Shutt& Tetley) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWHC 851 (Admin)

Acted for SoSJ defending claim by prisoners complaining that their privilege status within the prison was being improperly reduced by the fact that they were unable to undertake particular sex offender treatment as a result of being in denial of the crimes which had led to their incarceration.


R (French) v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2011] EWHC 546 (Admin)

Acted (with Paul Greaney QC) for officer dismissed for gross misconduct. Issues included bias, right to a fair discipline hearing and proper interpretation of various provisions of the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2008.


R (Flint) v Chief Constable of North Yorkshire Police [2010] EWHC 2025 (Admin)

Acted for Chief Constable. Whether Regulation 5(4) of the Police Regulations 2003 imposed a mandatory obligation on the Chief Constable to re- characterise a part-time officer as a full-time one, so as to enhance sick-pay entitlement.


R (North Yorkshire Police Authority) v IPCC [2010] EWHC 1690 (Admin)

Whether complaint about refusal by Chief Constable personally to investigate alleged criminal wrongdoing amounted to an issue relating to his personal conduct or one relating to the direction and control of his force. (Led by John Beggs QC).


R (Northumbria Police Authority) v Broome (March 2010)

Successful challenge to Selected Medical Practitioner’s approach to statutory review of a medically retired former police officer’s degree of disablement.


R (Muldoon) v Independent Police Complaints Commission [2009] EWHC 3633 Admin.

Successfully defended IPCC against allegations of bias and impropriety in its scrutiny of complaints about a Merseyside Police investigation of conduct of various police officers in their dealings with the Claimant’s son.


Siberry’s Application [2008] NIQB 147 (High Court of Northern Ireland)

Successful application for judicial review of decision of Senior Coroner to call Prisoner Ombudsman for Northern Ireland to give non-expert opinion evidence on standard of medical care afforded to deceased prison inmate.

 

News & Insights

Read more

Leading Silk

The Legal 500 - Crime (general and fraud)

"A very good and clear thinker with excellent strategic judgement"

The legal 500 2024 - Crime (General and Fraud)

"Sam has a well-deserved reputation for excellence. A committed, even fierce advocate. His clients know he is on their side"

The Legal 500 2024 - Crime (General and Fraud)

"An extremely personable individual who is always on top of his brief, impressive with clients and an excellent court room performer who commands the respect of the court."

The Legal 500 2022 - Business & Regulatory Crime

"Sam is a robust and effective cross-examiner, and can be ruthless when it is required. His attention to detail is second-to-none and his preparation is meticulous. Sam has a fantastic manner with the jury."

The Legal 500 2022 - Crime (General & Fraud)

"Recent work includes murder cases and other serious violent crime."

The Legal 500 2021 - Crime (General & Fraud)

"Very experienced in representing healthcare professionals in disciplinary work."

The Legal 500 2021 - Business Crime & Regulatory

"An extremely bright and accessible silk, and a master tactician."

The Legal 500 2020 - Crime (General & Fraud)

"Highly experienced in HSE prosecutions and police disciplinary matters."

The Legal 500 2020 - Business Crime & Regulatory

"His practice covers inquests, professional discipline (involving police officers) and health and safety."

The Legal 500 2019 - Business Crime & Regulatory

Appointments

  • Joint Head of Chambers (2022)
  • Recorder (2018)
  • Kings’s Counsel (2015)

Education

  • MA, Trinity College, Cambridge (1997)

News & Insights

Read more

Contact Us

Chambers is centrally located within walking distance of the train station, secure car parks and the Courts.

Contact Us

St Pauls Chambers
Park Row House
19-20 Park Row
Leeds
LS1 5JF

For out of hours assistance please call the senior clerk on 07854170429.

The switchboard will open from 08:30 until 17:30

Phone: +44 (0)1132 455 866
Email: [email protected]
CJSM: [email protected]

Portfolio Builder

Select the expertise that you would like to download or add to the portfolio

Download    Add to portfolio   
Portfolio
Title Type CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to share this shortlist.
(It will expire after 30 days.)