Our Expertise
St Pauls Chambers provides legal services throughout the UK and worldwide. We are known for providing excellence in our areas of focus.
As a leading barristers chambers in Leeds, our expertise span the depth and breadth of a number of key areas of law.
Our People
St Pauls Chambers have an excellent team of Barristers, Clerks & Administration, with our barristers including KC’s, Members and Pupils.
View our teams in full detail, or browse by expertise to find a barrister.
Call 1977 | Silk 2002 | Recorder Deputy High Court Judge 2012
Richard Clayton KC advises and litigates for and against public bodies on judicial review including social care, data protection, discrimination, local government law (eg vires and powers, governance issues and finance) and regulatory/disciplinary work. He is also a commercial litigator/arbitrator with particular expertise in public sector disputes; emergency injunctions like freezing and seizure orders; civil fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, insolvency etc. His international practice includes Privy Council appeals and court work in the Caribbean. He has conducted over 30 Supreme Court appeals.
Richard has sat as a Deputy High Court Judge since 2012, is a Bencher at Middle Temple, was the United Kingdom’s representative to the Venice Commission (the Council of Europe’s advisory body on constitutional law) from 2011 to 2019 and is a former Chairman of the Constitutional and Administrative Bar Association.
Chambers & Partners describe Richard as
“one of the finest minds at the Bar… an intellectual giant who is an asset to the Bar.”
“Brilliant on his feet”
“very sharp when it comes to tactics. He is very good at guiding you on what the judge is likely to be thinking, his “command of the subject is almost second to none. He is thoughtful, approachable, and very client-focused”
“affable and has a mature approach” “calm, reliable and consistent” and “has a very wide knowledge of the law.”
Richard undertakes public and constitutional law, both in the Privy Council and internationally. He sits as a Deputy High Court judge and as an international arbitrator. He undertakes work in the Caribbean (Anguilla, Bahamas, Belize, Cayman, St Vincent, Trinidad, Turks & Caicos), Canada, US, Channel Islands, Gibraltar, Hong Kong and Isle of Man.
Richard is instructed in many high profile cases in Trinidad. He is currently instructed to defend a senator defamation proceeding brought by the Prime Minister and in allegedly unlawful cartel arrangement concerning several construction contracts on behalf of a former Minister.
Richard was the United Kingdom representative to Venice Commission (Council of Europe’s advisory body on constitutional law) from 2011 to 2019. The Commission comprises independent experts in the field of constitutional law. Richard was a member of its Executive and Chairman of its Sub-Commission on Working Methods. He worked as a Rapporteur in Opinions concerning conscription and freedom of thought (Armenia), freedom of assembly (Russia), freedom of expression and defamation (Azerbaijan) (Italy) and judicial independence and mediation (Tajikistan), freedom of association and NGOs (Azerbaijan), (Hungary) and Romania and the rule of law crisis in Poland Malta and Slovakia.
Responsible Development to Abaco v Rt Hon Perry Christie (2021)
Privy Council grant permission to appeal to constitutional challenge to Bahamas security for costs orders in environmental cases
Boland v Chairman of Board of Inland Revenue (2022)
Privy Council- challenge to promotion system for Field Auditors
Seepeersad v AG of Trinidad (2021)
Privy Council decide important case on right to protection of law, holding that it is breached by detaining juveniles in adult prison
Hapgood v AG of Anguilla (2021)
AG successfully persuades Privy Council to refuse permission to appeal to alleged contempt is a “criminal cause”
AG of Anguilla v Lake (2021) (Privy Council)
compulsory purchase compensation acting for AG
Richard has experience of all types of complex commercial disputes. He has particular expertise in contractual issues which arise in the public sector including public procurement. Richard undertakes emergency injunction work such as freezing and seizure orders as well as arbitrations. He acts in cases concerning commercial contracts, civil fraud, breaches of directors’ duties, insolvency, restitution, shareholders’ rights, issues of statutory or contractual construction and public international law.
Current cases include representing a claimant in a $US150m arbitration arising from Qatar, defending damages claim for conspiracy where a strike out/summary judgment claim is pending, acting as arbitrator in a commercial dispute between a local authority and a private sector care provider, advising in relation to a £7m claim against two banks alleged to be jointly liable with financial advisors for fraud, advising various local authorities in relation to procurement issues, representing a former Minister, an allegedly unlawful cartel arrangements concerning several construction contracts in Trinidad and acting for defendants in a conspiracy claim.
Richard undertakes a wide range of advisory and litigation work (both for and against public bodies) covering community care, data protection, discrimination, environmental, healthcare, human rights, local government (e.g. vires and powers, constitutional issues and governance, elections, finance), public procurement, international work (particularly constitutional work) and regulatory/disciplinary work.
X v X (2021)
Whether balancing right to privacy against freedom of expression requires identifying parties in private law family proceedings)
R(D) v Tandridge DC (2021)
Representing council in application that claimant breached the Urgent Application procedure and is guilty of material non-disclosure.
Swale BC v Total Sprint (2021)
Defending rate claim for over £500,000
Re A (2021)
Advising combined authority on various constitutional issues
R(Hauret) v HMRC (2021)
EU challenge that loan charge legislation is a disproportionate interference with freedom of movement of capital.
R(Hannah) v Chartered Institute of Taxation (2021)
Whether the Institute is a “public body” and fairness lenge to Institute’s referral of his case to Taxation Disciplinary Board
R (Zeeman and Murphy) v HMRC (2020)
CA- HRA challenge to loan charge legislation as disproportionate interference with right to property
Southwark LBC v Ludgate House (2020)
CA decided that “guardianship schemes” are liable for business rates
Hollandwest v HMRC (2019)
Injunctions granted to preserve right of access to Court to clarify Supreme Court decision, OWD ltd v HMRC (2019)
Jones v Teaching Regulation Authority (2019)
Whether Secretary of State had power to supplement his statutory procedures by using common law power
R (British Homeopathy Association v National Health Service England (2018)
Consultation challenge to terminating homeopathy treatment)
R (English Bridge Union) v Sports England (2015)
Whether Sports England acted unlawfully in refusing to recognise bridge as a sport
Chambers is centrally located within walking distance of the train station, secure car parks and the Courts.
St Pauls Chambers
Park Row House
19-20 Park Row
Leeds
LS1 5JF
For out of hours assistance please call the senior clerk on 07854170429.
The switchboard will open from 08:30 until 17:30
Phone: +44 (0)1132 455 866
Email: [email protected]
CJSM: [email protected]